CVE
CVE-2025-41451
- First Reported
- Oct 13, 2026
- Latest Reported
- Oct 13, 2026
CVE Enrichment
- CVSS
- 8.7 HIGH
- EPSS
- 0.96%
- EPSS Percentile
- 60.49%
- CISA KEV
- Not listed
Description
Improper neutralization of alarm-to-mail configuration fields used in an OS shell Command ('Command Injection') in Danfoss AK-SM8xxA Series prior to version 4.3.1, leading to a potential post-authenticated remote code execution on an attacked system.
Technical Details
- CVSS Version
- 4.0
- CNA / NVD Source
- d7ff35af-cf88-454c-bab9-af60602f10f8
- Published
- 22-Aug-2025 10:15
- Last Modified
- 17-Jun-2026 16:22
- EPSS Date
- 2026-10-12
- CWE
- CWE-77
CVSS Vector
CVSS:4.0 AV:N /
AC:H /
AT:P /
PR:H /
UI:A /
VC:H /
VI:H /
VA:H /
SC:H /
SI:H /
SA:H /
E:X /
CR:X /
IR:X /
AR:X /
MAV:X /
MAC:X /
MAT:X /
MPR:X /
MUI:X /
MVC:X /
MVI:X /
MVA:X /
MSC:X /
MSI:X /
MSA:X /
S:X /
AU:X /
R:X /
V:X /
RE:X /
U:X
References
Last enrichment sync: 13-Oct-2026 21:21
Sources: NVD · FIRST EPSS · CISA KEV
Latest successful provider update; providers refresh independently.
Sources: NVD · FIRST EPSS · CISA KEV
Latest successful provider update; providers refresh independently.
Reported Context (2)
- CVE-2025-41450, CVE-2025-41451 and CVE-2025-41452 affect the AK-SM 800A, Claroty’s research did not cover the two end-of-life models Danfoss named, and no authority or vendor has linked the flaws to this incident. Attackers Disrupt Refrigeration Systems at Supermarkets Across France
- CVE-2025-41450 is an authentication bypass, a way past the login, in versions before 4.2. CVE-2025-41451 is a command injection flaw that could lead to remote code execution, and CVE-2025-41452 could allow a Attackers Hijack Danfoss Controllers to Heat French Supermarket Refrigerators
CVE (2)
People (8)
Threat Actors (1)
Vendors (1)
Products (6)
Tools (2)
Industries (3)
Countries (8)
Note: Related entities, including threat actors, malware, CVEs, MITRE ATT&CK techniques, vendors, products, tools, countries, and industries, are shown when they appear in the same reporting. Their presence does not necessarily mean they were targeted, compromised, vulnerable, responsible for the activity, or directly involved in the incident.