Kaspersky Assessment Report Finds Long-Undetected Intrusions and Response Gaps

· Original article ↗

Summary

Kaspersky’s 2025 compromise assessments found that 30.8% of discovered incidents had activity older than three months. The report highlights missed alerts, web shells in backups and gaps in monitoring and incident response.

Key points

  • Kaspersky analyzed its 2025 compromise-assessment engagements using endpoint scans, logs, network traffic and, where necessary, forensic investigation.
  • The oldest missed incident had persisted for nearly four years; 52% of high-severity compromises had historical activity spanning more than three months.
  • Of discovered incidents, 20% were found manually, while 60% had been missed because existing tools produced no high-confidence alerts.
  • Forty percent of discovered web shells were in backups, creating a risk of reinfection when files were restored.
  • Post-incident checkups had the highest share of high-severity findings at 40.7%, compared with 27.7% for general audits.
  • Case studies included NSABuffMiner on domain controllers, PurpleFox missed by disabled memory inspection, and LionTail detected through memory signatures.
  • The report recommends continuous monitoring, validation of low-confidence alerts, asset and backup reviews, and updated response playbooks.

Article Details

Publisher
Kaspersky
Report Period
2025
Scope
Missed incidents and response gaps identified in global compromise assessment engagements.
Key Statistics
  • Of discovered incidents, 20% were found manually and 60% had been missed because existing tools generated no high-confidence alerts.
  • Historical activity spanned more than three months in 30.8% of all discovered incidents and 52% of high-severity compromises; the oldest missed incident was four years old.
  • Of discovered web shells, 40% were stored in backups and 60% were on active systems.
  • Post-incident checkups had the highest proportion of high-severity findings, at 40.7%.
  • Internal communication issues materially affected response execution in 32% of projects.
Recommendations
  • Conduct regular compromise assessments and maintain continuous monitoring and threat hunting.
  • Validate detection-engine health, telemetry and rule relevance, and have analysts review low-confidence alerts.
  • Maintain a complete asset inventory, apply patches and audit logging, and audit GPO and shared-folder permissions.
  • Establish authorized remote-management baselines, centralize operational logs, and monitor for deviations and LoLBin abuse.
  • Update incident response plans as evidence emerges and conduct tabletop exercises that test technical and communication workflows.

MITRE ATT&CK

Threat Actors

Malware

Vendors

Products

Tools

Industries

Related Articles