Team Cymru Tracks 21 IPs Running CyberStrikeAI and Observes FortiGate Targeting

Summary
Team Cymru says it observed 21 IPs running CyberStrikeAI from January 20 to February 26, 2026, and NetFlow communications targeting Fortinet FortiGate devices. It provides the IPs; suspected Chinese state ties remain an assessment.
Key points
- Team Cymru observed 21 unique IP addresses running CyberStrikeAI between January 20 and February 26, 2026.
- The researchers identified the tool on an IP previously shared by Amazon's CTI team and used NetFlow data to observe communications targeting Fortinet FortiGate devices.
- The listed IPs were hosted across several locations, including China, Singapore, and Hong Kong.
- Team Cymru assesses that the developer, Ed1s0nZ, has ties to organizations it associates with Chinese government cyber operations; this is an assessment, not confirmation of state sponsorship.
- The article describes CyberStrikeAI as an open-source AI-native security testing platform integrating more than 100 security tools.
Article Details
- Event Type
- Observed deployment and use of CyberStrikeAI, an AI-enabled offensive security tool, including reported targeting of Fortinet FortiGate devices.
- Impact
- Team Cymru observed 21 unique IP addresses running CyberStrikeAI between January 20 and February 26, 2026. One server was observed communicating with and targeting FortiGate devices. The article does not confirm exploitation or compromise. Team Cymru assesses that the developer may have ties to the Chinese government, but does not establish state sponsorship or malicious activity by every observed server.
Indicators of compromise
| Type | Indicator | Context |
|---|---|---|
| IPV4 | 103[.]164[.]81[.]110 | Listed by Team Cymru as a server observed running CyberStrikeAI; malicious use by this host is not confirmed. |
| IPV4 | 106[.]52[.]47[.]65 | Listed by Team Cymru as a server observed running CyberStrikeAI; malicious use by this host is not confirmed. |
| IPV4 | 115[.]120[.]233[.]95 | Listed by Team Cymru as a server observed running CyberStrikeAI; malicious use by this host is not confirmed. |
| IPV4 | 117[.]72[.]103[.]145 | Listed by Team Cymru as a server observed running CyberStrikeAI; malicious use by this host is not confirmed. |
| IPV4 | 118[.]25[.]186[.]119 | Listed by Team Cymru as a server observed running CyberStrikeAI; malicious use by this host is not confirmed. |
| IPV4 | 142[.]171[.]160[.]137 | Listed by Team Cymru as a server observed running CyberStrikeAI; malicious use by this host is not confirmed. |
| IPV4 | 144[.]31[.]224[.]253 | Listed by Team Cymru as a server observed running CyberStrikeAI; malicious use by this host is not confirmed. |
| IPV4 | 146[.]190[.]195[.]154 | Listed by Team Cymru as a server observed running CyberStrikeAI; malicious use by this host is not confirmed. |
| IPV4 | 146[.]190[.]82[.]132 | Listed by Team Cymru as a server observed running CyberStrikeAI; malicious use by this host is not confirmed. |
| IPV4 | 154[.]219[.]114[.]92 | Listed by Team Cymru as a server observed running CyberStrikeAI; malicious use by this host is not confirmed. |
| IPV4 | 212[.]11[.]64[.]250 | Team Cymru reports this CyberStrikeAI server was observed targeting Fortinet FortiGate devices. |
| IPV4 | 38[.]38[.]250[.]182 | Listed by Team Cymru as a server observed running CyberStrikeAI; malicious use by this host is not confirmed. |
| IPV4 | 43[.]106[.]25[.]225 | Listed by Team Cymru as a server observed running CyberStrikeAI; malicious use by this host is not confirmed. |
| IPV4 | 43[.]167[.]237[.]212 | Listed by Team Cymru as a server observed running CyberStrikeAI; malicious use by this host is not confirmed. |
| IPV4 | 47[.]101[.]186[.]156 | Listed by Team Cymru as a server observed running CyberStrikeAI; malicious use by this host is not confirmed. |
| IPV4 | 47[.]95[.]33[.]207 | Listed by Team Cymru as a server observed running CyberStrikeAI; malicious use by this host is not confirmed. |
| IPV4 | 60[.]204[.]227[.]64 | Listed by Team Cymru as a server observed running CyberStrikeAI; malicious use by this host is not confirmed. |
| IPV4 | 62[.]234[.]61[.]215 | Listed by Team Cymru as a server observed running CyberStrikeAI; malicious use by this host is not confirmed. |
| IPV4 | 64[.]176[.]48[.]93 | Listed by Team Cymru as a server observed running CyberStrikeAI; malicious use by this host is not confirmed. |
| IPV4 | 81[.]70[.]144[.]252 | Listed by Team Cymru as a server observed running CyberStrikeAI; malicious use by this host is not confirmed. |
| IPV6 | 2400:d321:2308:1461::1 | Listed by Team Cymru as a server observed running CyberStrikeAI; malicious use by this host is not confirmed. |
People
Vendors
Products
Tools
CyberStrikeAIidentify malicious operations, and gain actionable intelligence. In this post, we are diving into CyberStrikeAI, an open-source artificial intelligence (AI) offensive security tool (OST) developed by a China-basedInfiltrateXInfiltrateX: A useful privilege escalation scanning tool. While automated detection of privilege escalation vulnerabilities is difficult, prone to occur, and poses serious risks, it can still strive to automate thePrivHunterAIPrivHunterAI: This tool uses a passive proxy approach and mainstream AI (such as Kimi, DeepSeek, GPT, etc.) to detect privilege escalation vulnerabilities. Its core detection function is built on the open APIs of the
Countries
ChinaCyberStrikeAI, an open-source artificial intelligence (AI) offensive security tool (OST) developed by a China-based developer who we assess has some ties to the Chinese government.Hong KongMany of the CyberStrikeAI servers were hosted in Chinese-speaking locals, namely China, Singapore, and Hong Kong. Which is to be expected for a tool developed by a Chinese-speaking coder.SingaporeMany of the CyberStrikeAI servers were hosted in Chinese-speaking locals, namely China, Singapore, and Hong Kong. Which is to be expected for a tool developed by a Chinese-speaking coder.
