CVE-2026-24763

CVE Enrichment

CVSS: 8.8 HIGH
EPSS: 5.22%
EPSS Percentile: 92.57%
CISA KEV: Not listed

Description

OpenClaw (formerly Clawdbot) is a personal AI assistant you run on your own devices. Prior to 2026.1.29, a command injection vulnerability existed in OpenClaw’s Docker sandbox execution mechanism due to unsafe handling of the PATH environment variable when constructing shell commands. An authenticated user able to control environment variables could influence command execution within the container context. This vulnerability is fixed in 2026.1.29.

Technical Details

CVSS Version: 3.1
CNA / NVD Source: [email protected]
Published: 03-Feb-2026 06:16
Last Modified: 17-Jun-2026 17:23
EPSS Date: 2026-11-09
CWE: CWE-78

CVSS Vector


            CVSS:3.1                            AV:N /
                            AC:L /
                            PR:L /
                            UI:N /
                            S:U /
                            C:H /
                            I:H /
                            A:H

CNA Products / Version Status

clawdbot · clawdbot Source: CNA · [email protected]
Default status: unknown

< 2026.1.29 — affected

Affected Products / Versions

openclaw / openclaw Source: NVD CPE · affected
Version / affected range: * · before (exclusive) 2026.1.29
cpe:2.3:a:openclaw:openclaw:*:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*

References

Last enrichment sync: 10-Nov-2026 13:34
Sources: NVD · FIRST EPSS · CISA KEV
Latest successful provider update; providers refresh independently.

Reported Context (1)

Multiple high-severity CVEs with public exploits impact OpenClaw (CVE-2026-24763, CVE-2026-25157, CVE-2026-25253), enabling container escape, command injection, and token exfiltration. BreachForums Seller Claims to Offer CEO’s OpenClaw Data and Root Access

CVE (2)

People (1)

Threat Actors (1)

MITRE ATT&CK (5)

Products (1)

Countries (1)

Note: Related entities, including threat actors, malware, CVEs, MITRE ATT&CK techniques, vendors, products, tools, countries, and industries, are shown when they appear in the same reporting. Their presence does not necessarily mean they were targeted, compromised, vulnerable, responsible for the activity, or directly involved in the incident.