Unit 42 Finds 45% of C2 Malware Samples Connect Directly to IPs

· Original article ↗

Summary

Unit 42 analyzed more than 4 million dynamic reports and found 45.32% of malware samples with C2 activity made at least one direct-to-IP connection, exposing limits in DNS-based defenses. The research details Phorpiex, SectopRAT, Mozi and Boatnet activity and proposes Z

Key points

  • Analysis of more than 4 million Advanced WildFire reports over 30 days found that 45.32% of malware samples with C2 activity made at least one direct-to-IP connection; these connections accounted for 23.17% of C2 attempts.
  • The direct-to-IP rate remained 41.97% after the analysis excluded bulk port-scanning behavior.
  • Unit 42 observed Phorpiex droppers contacting hard-coded IP addresses without prior DNS queries and fetching staged payloads.
  • An obfuscated HTTP GET exfiltration campaign used encoded requests and regularly rotated destination IP addresses and ports; its infrastructure was hosted on public cloud services in Brazil.
  • SectopRAT activity targeting educational institutions used an in-browser proxy to relay browsing activity and exfiltrate submitted usernames and plaintext passwords.
  • The analysis describes Mozi and Boatnet direct-to-IP activity against IoT devices; Boatnet binaries targeted at least 14 architectures, including m68k.
  • ZT-IP is a proposed network enforcement approach that permits outbound connections to IP addresses previously approved through DNS, with allowances for specified legitimate direct-IP traffic.

Article Details

Attack Vectors
  • Malware used hard-coded IP addresses for command-and-control connections without prior DNS queries.
  • Phorpiex-related activity downloaded staged payloads, including a binary from an IP-hosted URL.
  • A campaign used obfuscated HTTP GET requests to exfiltrate data through rotating destination IP addresses and ports.
  • SectopRAT mirrored victim browser traffic and exfiltrated submitted usernames and plaintext passwords.
  • Mozi and Boatnet used direct-to-IP communications in IoT botnet activity, including propagation through HTTP requests containing exploitation payloads.
Defensive Notes
  • ZT-IP checks whether an outbound IP destination was recently approved by DNS and flags or blocks connections without that approval.
  • ZT-IP uses allowlists and exemptions for private intranet addresses, trusted protocols, and well-known benign public IP addresses to reduce false positives.
  • The article says DNS-based controls alone can miss malware that communicates directly with IP addresses.
  • The article states that Advanced WildFire, Advanced URL Filtering, Advanced DNS Security, Cortex XDR, and XSIAM provide protections against threats discussed in the report.

Indicators of compromise

TypeIndicatorContext
IPV4103[.]245[.]236[.]146Listed by the article as a malicious destination IP address associated with the discussed activity.
IPV4178[.]16[.]54[.]109Malicious payload-delivery infrastructure associated with Phorpiex activity.
IPV4178[.]16[.]54[.]31Listed by the article as a malicious destination IP address associated with the discussed activity.
IPV418[.]228[.]188[.]56Destination shown for the obfuscated GET campaign, which the article describes as using cloud-hosted C2 infrastructure.
IPV4194[.]76[.]227[.]94Infrastructure used by one of the reported SectopRAT attackers targeting educational institutions.
IPV42[.]26[.]98[.]67Identified as the distribution IP address for the Boatnet Mirai variant.
IPV4206[.]189[.]229[.]43Listed by the article as a malicious destination IP address associated with the discussed activity.
IPV462[.]60[.]179[.]230Listed by the article as a malicious destination IP address associated with the discussed activity.
IPV487[.]120[.]107[.]33Infrastructure used by one of the reported SectopRAT attackers targeting educational institutions.
IPV491[.]92[.]243[.]29Listed by the article as a malicious destination IP address associated with the discussed activity.
SHA25601a96eeafb72042b3f69afd21b4c9155dbfe7f97ab3dca392972ad531a075ac2Listed as a malware sample hash associated with the activity discussed in the report.
SHA2569639f7ebc6a6d69d7bf5b8bc869e7783a1406088f192868624ad8919e9bfd1d4Listed as a malware sample hash associated with the activity discussed in the report.
SHA256bf24277400cc453d530e4277d3bd24e96c5e409adef6970518bdc59205aa0241Listed as a malware sample hash associated with the activity discussed in the report.
SHA256cc43cdbe8eb9874f55fffbe23b560b673eb9f31fb9a953926bba29464fd2dd07Hash of an associated malware sample analyzed in connection with the obfuscated GET exfiltration campaign.
SHA256e310476c41ae4f6e3c4ed9bb88303ee6e5e1455bd7afe51cf48965ea7599e6e5Listed as a malware sample hash associated with the activity discussed in the report.
SHA256e3513922666c202c1ae5c06eea277ba10477868d6d89ce2819f4f8ff9070bc85Listed as a malware sample hash associated with the activity discussed in the report.
SHA256e5715e6611ef6bcb233f5d2098510dab3db408abbb728b00e1821bb255829373Listed as a malware sample hash associated with the activity discussed in the report.
URLhxxp[:]//178[.]16[.]54[.]109/st.exePhorpiex-associated binary retrieval URL identified by the article as a malicious payload.

MITRE ATT&CK

Malware

Vendors

Products

Tools

Countries

Industries

Related Articles