Meta Ordered to Pay $25 Billion in New Mexico Facebook Privacy Case

· Original article ↗

Summary

A New Mexico judge ordered Meta to pay $25 billion after a jury found Facebook made misleading statements about privacy and other practices. Meta says it expects to win on appeal.

Key points

  • A New Mexico jury found that Meta and its leadership made 26 misleading statements about data privacy, hate speech, and other subjects.
  • The judge said post-audience controls did not necessarily limit what outside app developers could access; separate settings governed that access.
  • The New Mexico Department of Justice said the jury found 43,899,725 violations. The count estimated the audience for each statement, not the number of people whose data was taken.
  • The judge reduced a penalty exceeding $219 billion under state law to $25 billion; Meta says it expects to win on appeal.
  • The lawsuit followed revelations that Cambridge Analytica obtained information from as many as 87 million Facebook users through a third-party app.
  • The article advises limiting shared personal details, reviewing app permissions and tracking settings, and being cautious with connected apps; it notes that privacy settings cannot guarantee privacy.

Article Details

Event Type
New Mexico civil consumer-protection judgment over Facebook’s data privacy practices and representations, resulting in a $25 billion penalty against Meta.
Impact
A jury found 43,899,725 violations of state law, a count based on the estimated audience for misleading statements rather than the number of individual people whose data was taken. The judge reduced a penalty that could have exceeded $219 billion to $25 billion. The penalties are directed to New Mexico’s school system, not individual users. Meta says it expects to prevail on appeal.

People

Vendors

Products

Industries

Related Articles