VulnCheck Report Highlights Rapid Exploitation and Ransomware Zero-Day Use in 2025
Report discovered via Awesome Annual Security Reports.

Summary
VulnCheck identified 884 CVEs with first-time exploitation evidence in 2025; 28.96% were exploited on or before CVE publication. Its annual report also highlights ransomware zero-days and growing volumes of unreliable AI-generated exploit code.
Key points
- Drawing on more than two dozen indices and over 500 sources, VulnCheck identified 884 CVEs with first-time exploitation evidence in 2025; 28.96% were exploited on or before their CVE publication date.
- The report tracked more than 14,400 exploits for 2025 CVEs, up 16.5% year over year, and warned that AI-generated, nonfunctional or misleading code undermines public repository reliability.
- Of 39 vulnerabilities disclosed in 2025 with known ransomware exploitation, 56.4% were discovered through zero-day exploitation. One-third still lacked public or commercial exploits as of January 2026.
- React2Shell, CVE-2025-55182, accumulated 236 valid public exploits during the final four weeks of 2025. Four SharePoint ToolShell vulnerabilities were exploited at scale beginning in July.
- VulnCheck observed a 52% year-over-year increase in China-nexus threat actor attributions, while the number of new vulnerabilities linked to state-sponsored groups fell 13%.
- The report examines Cl0p's Oracle E-Business Suite campaign, highlighting uncertainty over how observed exploit chains map to CVE-2025-61882 and CVE-2025-61884.
- Botnet exploitation of current-year CVEs fell 53%, but RondoDox continued incorporating older and newer public exploits, illustrating that delayed exploitation remains a remediation risk.
Article Details
- Publisher
- VulnCheck
- Report Period
- 2025, with selected observations through January 2026
- Scope
- Vulnerability exploitation, public exploit availability, threat actor attribution, ransomware, and botnet activity.
- Sample Size
- More than two dozen VulnCheck indices and 500+ sources; 884 CVEs with first-time exploitation evidence from 118 unique sources.
- Key Statistics
- VulnCheck identified 884 CVEs with first-time exploitation evidence in 2025; 28.96% were exploited on or before their CVE publication date.
- More than 14,400 exploits for 2025 CVEs were identified, a 16.5% year-over-year increase. More than 98% of tracked exploits were proof-of-concept code rather than fully weaponized exploits.
- Among 39 CVEs disclosed in 2025 with known ransomware exploitation, 56.4% were discovered through zero-day exploitation. One-third had no public or commercial exploit available as of January 2026.
- There were 52 CVEs from 2025 with named threat actor attribution; China-nexus threat actor attributions increased 52% year over year.
- VulnCheck tracked 23 CVEs with 2025 identifiers exploited by botnets, representing a reported 53% decline in botnet activity across recent CVEs.
- Recommendations
- Prioritize vulnerability remediation using confirmed in-the-wild exploitation, exploit maturity, and attacker behavior rather than vulnerability volume alone.
- Validate public proof-of-concept code rather than treating repository publication as authoritative evidence of a functioning exploit.
- Continue prioritizing older exposed vulnerabilities for remediation; delayed exploitation does not imply reduced risk.
- Treat ransomware leak-site posts as an imperfect activity metric rather than confirmation of incidents or evidence that a group is dormant.
MITRE ATT&CK
T1190 · Exploit Public-Facing ApplicationEarth Lamia exploits known vulnerabilities in internet-facing systems; Cl0p and DragonForce also exploited exposed enterprise applications for initial access.T1203 · Exploitation for Client ExecutionRomCom used client-side exploitation of WinRAR CVE‑2025‑8088 in operations described as achieving persistence.T1486 · Data Encrypted for ImpactDragonForce deployed ransomware, including leaked LockBit and modified Conti variants, and a later variant addressed encryption weaknesses.T1496 · Resource HijackingHosts compromised by RondoDox were reportedly used for cryptocurrency mining.T1498 · Network Denial of ServiceHosts compromised by RondoDox were reportedly used for distributed denial-of-service activity.T1562.001 · Disable or Modify ToolsDragonForce used vulnerable kernel drivers to disable security protections; Akira affiliates also abused driver vulnerabilities to disable security software.
People
Threat Actors
4L4MD4RNamed among ransomware groups linked to the SharePoint ToolShell vulnerabilities.AkiraAffiliates abused ThrottleStop CVE‑2025‑7771 in a bring-your-own-vulnerable-driver attack before using another driver vulnerability to disable security software.Cl0pConducted file-transfer exploitation and data-extortion operations, including the Oracle EBS attacks. The report says some analyses also refer to it as TA505, FIN11, and Lace Tempest, while separately noting Lace Tempest's deployment of Cl0p ransomware.DragonForceRansomware group using an affiliate model, vulnerability exploitation, social engineering, and vulnerable drivers to disable defenses. Its origins remain uncertain.Earth LamiaDescribed as a China-nexus group that incorporated SAP CVE‑2025‑31324 and React2Shell into its exploitation of internet-facing systems.FIN11Listed as a historical affiliation and a name used for Cl0p in some analyses.Hunters InternationalAttributed an incident using Oracle WebLogic Server CVE‑2025‑21535 for initial access and linked to ransomware use of FortiOS CVE‑2024‑55591.QilinLinked to SharePoint ToolShell exploitation and ransomware use of FortiOS CVE‑2024‑55591.ROMCOMDescribed as Russia-aligned and using client-side exploitation, including WinRAR CVE‑2025‑8088.Scattered Lapsus$ HuntersDescribed as a more recent blend of loosely affiliated cybercrime groups associated in the narrative with Shiny Hunters and the publication of the alleged Oracle EBS exploit.Shiny HuntersRival cybercrime group that claimed ownership of the Oracle EBS exploit used by Cl0p and published the alleged exploit. The report associates it with the more recent loosely affiliated blend called Scattered Lapsus$ Hunters.TA505Listed as a historical affiliation and a name used for Cl0p in some analyses.WarlockNamed among ransomware groups linked to the SharePoint ToolShell vulnerabilities.
Malware
Cl0pstrategy and operations, two of which we’ll look at in this report: DragonForce and Cl0p.Contiusing leaked LockBit and modified Conti variants one of more than a dozen different EDRs and securityDeadLockare available, the vulnerability used in intrusions as of January access in an incident attributed attack that ended in DeadLockDragonForceransomware families (DragonForce, Hunters International, NightSpire, Qilin, RansomHub, and SuperBlack)LockBitusing leaked LockBit and modified Conti variants one of more than a dozen different EDRs and securityMedusainitial access in Play, Medusa, and other ransomware incidents.Miraisharp decline in CVEs exploited by the long‑suffered Mirai botnet. New Mirai CVE attributionsPlayinitial access in Play, Medusa, and other ransomware incidents.Qilinvulnerabilities were linked to multiple China-nexus actors and ransomware groups, including Warlock, Qilin, and 4L4MD4R.RondoDoxCVE‑2025‑55182: Meta React Server Components Gafgyt, Mirai, RondoDox, unattributed activity
Vendors
Fortinet| CVE‑2024‑55591* (Fortinet) | 2 | 7 | 8 | - |FortraFortra GoAnywhere MFT A trio of zero‑day vulnerabilities Oracle WebLogic Server A Baidu Antivirus driverMicrosoft- [Four’s a Crowd: Microsoft SharePoint “ToolShell”](#fours-a-crowd-microsoft-sharepoint-toolshell)OracleFortra GoAnywhere MFT A trio of zero‑day vulnerabilities Oracle WebLogic Server A Baidu Antivirus driverRapid7permissions issue in Rapid7’s open‑source Velociraptor DFIR tool that Cisco Talos said could have beenRARLABexploited flaws like CVE‑2025‑8088 (RARLAB WinRAR path traversal), CVE‑2025‑3248 (LangflowSAP| CVE‑2025‑31324 (SAP) | 9 | 4 | 22 | - |
Products
FortiOSFortinet FortiOS CVE‑2024‑55591, a zero‑day authentication bypass vulnerability disclosed in JanuaryFortra GoAnywhere MFTFortra GoAnywhere MFT A trio of zero‑day vulnerabilities Oracle WebLogic Server A Baidu Antivirus driverMicrosoft SharePoint- [Four’s a Crowd: Microsoft SharePoint “ToolShell”](#fours-a-crowd-microsoft-sharepoint-toolshell)Oracle E‑Business SuiteThat’s exactly what happened in late September 2025, when Oracle E‑Business Suite (EBS) • IT security managementOracle WebLogicFortra GoAnywhere MFT A trio of zero‑day vulnerabilities Oracle WebLogic Server A Baidu Antivirus driverReact Server ComponentsCVE‑2025‑55182, a critical remote code execution (RCE) flaw in React Server Components, managed to rack up an impressive 236 valid public exploits in the last four weeks of 2025. It is the industry’s most publiclySAP NetWeaverCVE‑2025‑31324 SAP NetWeaver Unrestricted File Upload 4 9 22 0 9.8 CriticalSimpleHelp| CVE‑2024‑57727* (SimpleHelp) | 0 | 5 | 50 | 100 |ThrottleStopThrottleStop (rwdrv.sys) driver flaw that Akira affiliates abused in a BYOVD attack before using aWinRAR| CVE‑2025‑8088 (WinRAR) | 8 | 11 | 21 | - |
Tools
Countries
Argentinamix of organizations in the UK, Switzerland, Argentina, critically, it also allows DragonForce to scale operationsAustraliaclaim credit for hacks on Yakult Australia and the Ohio for themselves, which also contributes to attributionChinaCVE‑2025‑53771) exploited at scale starting in July 2025. These vulnerabilities were linked to multiple China-nexus actors and ransomware groups, including Warlock, Qilin, and 4L4MD4R.PalauDragonForce was attributed to attacks on Palau’sRussiaRomCom (Russia-aligned) continues to favor client-side exploitation, such as the use of CVE‑2025‑8088 (WinRAR) to achieve persistence. This reinforces the durability of user-driven execution paths as an effectiveSingaporehealthcare companies, Coca‑Cola Singapore, and a makes attacks more difficult to attribute conclusively;South Africaand South Africa. The same month saw DragonForce quickly by incentivizing affiliates looking to make namesSwitzerlandmix of organizations in the UK, Switzerland, Argentina, critically, it also allows DragonForce to scale operationsUnited Kingdommix of organizations in the UK, Switzerland, Argentina, critically, it also allows DragonForce to scale operationsUnited Statesthe leak site’s appearance, including several U.S.‑based has several distinct advantages — for one thing, it
Industries
Healthcarehealthcare companies, Coca‑Cola Singapore, and a makes attacks more difficult to attribute conclusively;Manufacturingand manufacturing organizations are common inRetailSo how, exactly, did a relatively new group rack up such a DragonForce’s victimology, though retail and otherTelecommunicationsinformation about their breach of Singaporean telecommunications provider Singtel as part of they often don’tUtility billingSophos and Singapore‑based IB‑Group both note activity been used to compromise a utility billing provider; and