Cyber Insurance Cannot Replace Strong Cybersecurity Defenses

· Original article ↗

Summary

The article reviews common cyber insurance exclusions, darknet indicators of insider and prior-breach risks, and attacks targeting insurance-related businesses. It argues that insurance should supplement—not replace—strong security practices.

Key points

  • The article says policies may exclude losses tied to human error, insider attacks, known unremediated vulnerabilities, prior breaches, and security improvements; coverage depends on policy terms.
  • Darknet posts have advertised payments to employees with access, including telecom insiders sought for SIM-swapping and LAPSUS$ recruitment of workers with remote network access.
  • DarkOwl describes monitoring credentials, prior-breach claims, and leaked data as ways insurers could assess exposure, while noting that darknet claims are not proof of a breach.
  • The article cites a threat actor's allegation of repeated compromise and data theft at an unnamed organization; the claim is attributed to the actor, not independently confirmed in the article.
  • It reports that ransomware groups have targeted insurance agents, affiliated businesses, brokers, underwriting services, and legal firms, and cites LockBit's public claims involving insurance-related disputes.

Article Details

Topic
Cyber insurance exclusions, insider threats, and darknet monitoring

Threat Actors

Vendors

Products

Countries

Industries

Related Articles