Ring Ends Planned Flock Partnership After Backlash Over Super Bowl Ad

· Original article ↗

Summary

Ring ended its planned partnership with Flock after backlash over a lost-pet feature in its Super Bowl ad. The article also reports subscription cancellations and legal threats amid wider concerns about surveillance and access to camera footage.

Key points

  • Ring’s Super Bowl ad introduced a feature intended to help users locate lost pets, drawing criticism that it could enable intrusive surveillance.
  • Ring ended its planned partnership with Flock, an automatic license plate reader company; the partnership would have allowed Ring to access video databases tied to its cameras.
  • The article reports subscription cancellations and threatened lawsuits following the backlash.
  • Ring’s police partnerships and Amazon ownership are part of broader concerns about access to camera footage and surveillance.
  • Ring paid $5.8 million to settle allegations that employees accessed customers’ private video data without authorization.

Article Details

Event Type
Public backlash and privacy controversy following Ring’s Super Bowl advertisement introducing a lost-pet feature.
Impact
Criticism included concerns that the feature enabled intrusive surveillance. The article reports subscription cancellations and threatened lawsuits, and says Ring ended its planned partnership with Flock. The controversy renewed concerns about surveillance, law-enforcement access to camera footage, and privacy.

Vendors

Products

Countries

Industries

Related Articles