CVE
CVE-2026-76501
- First Reported
- Oct 8, 2026
- Latest Reported
- Oct 12, 2026
CVE Enrichment
- CVSS
- 9.8 CRITICAL
- EPSS
- 0.51%
- EPSS Percentile
- 41.68%
- CISA KEV
- Not listed
Description
A vulnerability in the Segment Routing over IPv6 (SRv6) Operation, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) feature of Cisco NX-OS Software, known as NGOAM, could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code with root privileges or cause a denial of service (DoS) on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to improper input validation of IP traffic when the NGOAM and SRv6 features are enabled. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted packets to an IP interface on an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code with root privileges and could cause process crashes resulting in a reload and DoS condition.
Technical Details
- CVSS Version
- 3.1
- CNA / NVD Source
- psirt@cisco.com
- Published
- 08-Oct-2026 00:17
- Last Modified
- 09-Oct-2026 03:08
- EPSS Date
- 2026-10-10
- CWE
- CWE-121
CVSS Vector
CVSS:3.1 AV:N /
AC:L /
PR:N /
UI:N /
S:U /
C:H /
I:H /
A:H
References
Sources: NVD · FIRST EPSS · CISA KEV
Latest successful provider update; providers refresh independently.
Reported Context (2)
- CVE-2026-76455, CVE-2026-76459, CVE-2026-76471, CVE-2026-76465, CVE-2026-76485, CVE-2026-76486, CVE-2026-76501, CVE-2026-76498, CVE-2026-76499, CVE-2026-76500 (Cisco), CVE-2026-76281, CVE-2026-76282, Weekly Cybersecurity Recap Highlights Exploited Atlassian Flaw and Other Threats
- CVE-2026-76485, CVE-2026-76486, and CVE-2026-76501: Improper validation of IP traffic can be exploited through crafted packets sent to an IP interface; all three require NGOAM to be enabled. Cisco warns of five critical flaws that could let attackers take over Nexus switches
CVE (53)
Vendors (2)
Products (15)
Tools (1)
Note: Related entities, including threat actors, malware, CVEs, MITRE ATT&CK techniques, vendors, products, tools, countries, and industries, are shown when they appear in the same reporting. Their presence does not necessarily mean they were targeted, compromised, vulnerable, responsible for the activity, or directly involved in the incident.