CVE
CVE-2026-15316
- First Reported
- Sep 18, 2026
- Latest Reported
- Sep 18, 2026
CVE Enrichment
- CVSS
- 7.1 HIGH
- EPSS
- 0.24%
- EPSS Percentile
- 13.94%
- CISA KEV
- Not listed
Description
An improper input validation vulnerability in the configuration service for processing encrypted credential data has been identified in Tapo C200 v5. An attacker can send oversized crypted ciphertext values that may trigger exception handling failures, due to insufficient validation, causing the affected device to crash or restart. Successful exploitation may temporarily disrupt HTTPS management and monitoring functionality, resulting in a denial-of-service (DoS) condition until the service recovers.
Technical Details
- CVSS Version
- 4.0
- CNA / NVD Source
- f23511db-6c3e-4e32-a477-6aa17d310630
- Published
- 19-Aug-2026 05:16
- Last Modified
- 05-Sep-2026 00:26
- EPSS Date
- 2026-10-16
- CWE
- CWE-20
CVSS Vector
CVSS:4.0 AV:A /
AC:L /
AT:N /
PR:N /
UI:N /
VC:N /
VI:N /
VA:H /
SC:N /
SI:N /
SA:N /
E:X /
CR:X /
IR:X /
AR:X /
MAV:X /
MAC:X /
MAT:X /
MPR:X /
MUI:X /
MVC:X /
MVI:X /
MVA:X /
MSC:X /
MSI:X /
MSA:X /
S:X /
AU:X /
R:X /
V:X /
RE:X /
U:X
Affected Products / Versions
- tp-link / tapo_c200_firmware
Version / affected range: * · before (exclusive) 1.4.6
cpe:2.3:o:tp-link:tapo_c200_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
References
- f23511db-6c3e-4e32-a477-6aa17d310630
- f23511db-6c3e-4e32-a477-6aa17d310630
- f23511db-6c3e-4e32-a477-6aa17d310630
Sources: NVD · FIRST EPSS · CISA KEV
Latest successful provider update; providers refresh independently.
Reported Context (1)
- TP-Link fixed both issues, tracked as CVE-2026-15315 and CVE-2026-15316, in firmware V5_1.4.6 released in August. Weekly Cybersecurity Roundup: Ransomware Sentencing, AI Agent Attacks and Critical Flaws
CVE (2)
Malware (4)
Threat Actors (1)
MITRE ATT&CK (2)
Vendors (6)
Products (9)
Industries (1)
Countries (2)
Note: Related entities, including threat actors, malware, CVEs, MITRE ATT&CK techniques, vendors, products, tools, countries, and industries, are shown when they appear in the same reporting. Their presence does not necessarily mean they were targeted, compromised, vulnerable, responsible for the activity, or directly involved in the incident.