CVE
CVE-2022-0543
Redis · Redis
- First Reported
- May 27, 2026
- Latest Reported
- May 27, 2026
CVE Enrichment
- CVSS
- 10.0 CRITICAL
- EPSS
- 99.35%
- EPSS Percentile
- 99.94%
- CISA KEV
- YES — Known Exploited Vulnerability
Description
It was discovered, that redis, a persistent key-value database, due to a packaging issue, is prone to a (Debian-specific) Lua sandbox escape, which could result in remote code execution.
Technical Details
- CVSS Version
- 3.1
- CNA / NVD Source
- [email protected]
- Published
- 19-Feb-2022 03:15
- Last Modified
- 17-Jun-2026 11:20
- EPSS Date
- 2026-11-01
- CWE
- CWE-862
CVSS Vector
CVSS:3.1 AV:N /
AC:L /
PR:N /
UI:N /
S:C /
C:H /
I:H /
A:H
CISA KEV Details
- Date Added
- 2022-03-28
- Remediation Due
- 2022-04-18
- Known Ransomware Campaign Use
- Unknown
- Required Action
- Apply updates per vendor instructions.
- Notes
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-0543
Affected Products / Versions
- redis / redis
Source: NVD CPE · affected
Version / affected range: -
cpe:2.3:a:redis:redis:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
References
- af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108
- af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108
- af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108
- af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108
- af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108
- af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108
- CISA Advisory
Last enrichment sync: 02-Nov-2026 20:28
Sources: NVD · FIRST EPSS · CISA KEV
Latest successful provider update; providers refresh independently.
Sources: NVD · FIRST EPSS · CISA KEV
Latest successful provider update; providers refresh independently.
Reported Context (1)
- [Vulnerability identifiers ] Exploitation vectors linked to botnet spread – CVE-2025-11953, CVE-2025-49844, CVE-2022-0543 FortiGuard Finds Persistent P2Pinfect Infections in GKE and Links Peers to Metro4Shell
CVE (2)
Malware (1)
MITRE ATT&CK (7)
Vendors (2)
Products (9)
Note: Related entities, including threat actors, malware, CVEs, MITRE ATT&CK techniques, vendors, products, tools, countries, and industries, are shown when they appear in the same reporting. Their presence does not necessarily mean they were targeted, compromised, vulnerable, responsible for the activity, or directly involved in the incident.
