Aikido Maps Its Security Platform to SOC 2 Type 1 and Type 2 Evidence Needs

· Original article ↗

Summary

Aikido says its security platform can generate SOC 2 evidence through continuous scanning, remediation tracking, access checks and CI/CD gates. The article contrasts Type 1 snapshot evidence with Type 2 evidence collected across an audit period.

Key points

  • SOC 2 Type 1 assesses whether controls are appropriately designed at a point in time; Type 2 evaluates whether they operated effectively throughout a period, typically 3 to 12 months.
  • Aikido says its scanning tools, cloud posture checks and remediation workflows can provide exportable evidence for controls covering access, encryption, software integrity and vulnerability management.
  • The platform’s CI/CD gates can block pull requests or releases when issues exceed a configured severity threshold; the article says gate decisions, overrides and exceptions are logged.
  • Aikido describes its AI pentesting as testing applications, APIs and infrastructure for exploitable flaws, with reports showing what was tested and what vulnerabilities were found.
  • The article recommends starting continuous scanning and SLA tracking before a Type 2 audit period begins, since evidence cannot be collected retroactively.
  • Aikido notes that a tool alone will not pass an audit; auditors may also require policies, procedures, risk assessments, access reviews and incident response processes.

Article Details

Topic
How Aikido supports SOC 2 Type 1 and Type 2 compliance by consolidating security controls and audit evidence.

Vendors

Products

Related Articles