Black Duck BSIMM16 Finds AI and Regulation Reshaping Software Security Programs

· Original Report (PDF) ↗

Summary

Black Duck’s BSIMM16 report examines software security practices at 111 organizations, finding growth in vulnerability disclosure, SBOM creation, infrastructure security automation, and just-in-time training as firms address AI and regulatory demands.

Key points

  • BSIMM16 analyzes anonymized assessment data from 111 organizations against 128 software security activities; historical counts are normalized to the current sample for trend comparisons.
  • Incident response integration was the most observed activity at 87.6%, followed by security checkpoints and governance at 82.6%.
  • Streamlined responsible vulnerability disclosure grew by more than 40% over BSIMM15, while SBOM creation increased by approximately 30% and automated infrastructure security verification by more than 50%.
  • The report links AI-generated code risks to increased application risk ranking and custom automated code-review rules, while recommending continued human-driven security testing.
  • Expertise delivered through open collaboration channels increased by 29%, reflecting a shift toward just-in-time security training and targeted lessons drawn from testing findings.
  • Security champions programs appeared in 90% of the highest-scoring firms versus 22% of the lowest-scoring group, showing an association with broader institutionalization of software security.
  • The report updates BSIMM references affecting 16 NIST SSDF tasks and recommends AI-specific attack patterns, approved secure designs, supply-chain controls, and coordinated vulnerability response.

Article Details

Publisher
BlackDuck
Scope
Observational benchmarking of software security initiatives across industry verticals using 128 activities in 12 practices and four domains.
Sample Size
111 organizations; business-unit assessments are excluded from the annual report data pool.
Key Statistics
  • Incident-response integration was observed in 87.6% of the 111 organizations, making it the most frequently observed BSIMM16 activity.
  • Responsible vulnerability disclosure streamlining increased by 15 observations and more than 40% compared with BSIMM15.
  • Automated verification of operational infrastructure security grew by more than 50% compared with the previous year.
  • Security champions programs were present in 90% of the highest-scoring group, compared with 22% of the lowest-scoring group.
  • Median software security group size was 10, compared with an average of 33.5 across the 111 firms; the report cautions that large outliers affect staffing statistics.
Recommendations
  • Benchmark the software security initiative with a BSIMM scorecard and create a prioritized improvement plan aligned with business risk.
  • Maintain regularly updated inventories covering applications, third-party code, SBOMs, APIs, scripts, and infrastructure-as-code; favor automated discovery and management.
  • Establish cross-functional standards for AI/ML adoption, use application risk rankings to restrict AI-generated code where appropriate, and require automated SAST scans alongside human-driven testing.
  • Extend software supply chain risk management to AI/ML services, including documented shared responsibilities, vendor privacy and security SLAs, and rules governing data sharing and training data.
  • Streamline vulnerability intake and involve software security experts in incident response, using operational findings to improve development controls.

Industries

Cloud- **Champions**. A group of interested and engaged developers, cloud security engineers, deployment engineers, architects, software managers, testers, or people in similar roles who have an active interest in softwareFinancial Servicesthe software security activities of 111 organizations across different verticals, including Cloud, Financial Services, Financial Technology (FinTech), Healthcare, Independent Software Vendors (ISVs), Insurance,Financial Technologyof 111 organizations across different verticals, including Cloud, Financial Services, Financial Technology (FinTech), Healthcare, Independent Software Vendors (ISVs), Insurance, Internet of Things (IoT), andHealthcareacross different verticals, including Cloud, Financial Services, Financial Technology (FinTech), Healthcare, Independent Software Vendors (ISVs), Insurance, Internet of Things (IoT), and Technology Organizations.Independent Software Vendors (ISVs)including Cloud, Financial Services, Financial Technology (FinTech), Healthcare, Independent Software Vendors (ISVs), Insurance, Internet of Things (IoT), and Technology Organizations.InsuranceFinancial Services, Financial Technology (FinTech), Healthcare, Independent Software Vendors (ISVs), Insurance, Internet of Things (IoT), and Technology Organizations.Internet of ThingsFinancial Technology (FinTech), Healthcare, Independent Software Vendors (ISVs), Insurance, Internet of Things (IoT), and Technology Organizations.Technology OrganizationsHealthcare, Independent Software Vendors (ISVs), Insurance, Internet of Things (IoT), and Technology Organizations.