2026 GRC Report Highlights Rising Framework Demands, Automation and Vendor-Risk Gaps
Original report publisher: not verified. Report discovered via Awesome Annual Security Reports.

Summary
Episki’s qualitative 2026 GRC report describes rising regulatory and framework demands, expanding automation, and vendor-risk gaps, with directional budget benchmarks and predictions for 2027.
Key points
- The report says organizations it works with increasingly manage three or more frameworks, including SOC 2, ISO 27001, CMMC, and PCI DSS; it describes ISO/IEC 42001 as an emerging framework.
- It says PCI DSS v4.0.1 requirements previously treated as best practices became enforceable after March 31, 2025, and describes CMMC assessments and subcontractor requirements as expanding.
- The report identifies evidence collection, cross-framework control mapping, and questionnaire responses as automation use cases, while saying risk assessment and evidence interpretation still need human judgment.
- It characterizes many third-party risk programs as broad but shallow and highlights continuous vendor monitoring, concentration risk, and fourth-party risk as concerns.
- Its directional benchmarks put annual GRC spend for a Series A company at $75,000–$250,000; the report cautions that costs vary by scope and maturity.
- The methodology is a qualitative synthesis of customer conversations, practitioner interviews, public guidance, and industry benchmarks—not a formal quantitative survey; numeric ranges are described as directional.
Article Details
- Publisher
- Episki
- Report Period
- 2026
- Scope
- Qualitative analysis of GRC regulations, framework adoption, budgets, automation, vendor risk, and workforce trends.
- Sample Size
- Qualitative synthesis across hundreds of conversations; not a formal quantitative survey.
- Key Statistics
- The report describes three or more active frameworks as typical for B2B SaaS companies above $50M ARR.
- Estimated annual GRC spend for Series A companies (25–75 employees): $75K–$250K; the report presents this as a directional market range.
- Estimated GRC budget shares: audit and assessment fees 25–40%; tooling and platforms 15–30%; internal labor 25–45%; remediation and implementation 10–25%. These are directional ranges, not precise benchmarks.
- Recommendations
- Establish a unified control catalog mapped to active and planned frameworks.
- Assign named control owners with clear accountability.
- Implement or validate automated evidence collection for high-volume controls.
- Continuously monitor critical vendors and account for third-party-origin incidents in incident response plans.
Vendors
Industries
B2B SaaSBy the time a company is past $50M ARR in B2B SaaS, three or more active frameworks is the norm.Defensefinal rule (32 CFR Part 170) and the acquisition rule changes (48 CFR) are reshaping procurement for the Defense Industrial Base.Financial Services- **Fintech:** SOC 2 Type II, PCI DSS (if applicable), and increasingly SOC 1 Type II for financial services customers.fintech- **Fintech:** SOC 2 Type II, PCI DSS (if applicable), and increasingly SOC 1 Type II for financial services customers.govtech- **Govtech / defense:** NIST 800-171 → CMMC Level 2 → FedRAMP where applicable.Healthcare| HITRUST CSF | Growing in healthcare | Payer and hospital preference |