Ransomware Negotiation Tactics and Lessons From Three Real-World Cases

Summary
The article outlines steps for organizations considering ransomware negotiations, including assembling response specialists, investigating potential data theft, managing communications, and documenting exchanges. It cautions that payment offers no guarantee of recovery.
Key points
- The FBI advises against paying ransoms, citing no guarantee of recovery and the risk of funding further criminal activity.
- Before contacting attackers, organizations are advised to assemble security, legal, and leadership teams and investigate encryption and possible data exfiltration.
- The article recommends monitoring leak sites and extortion channels, including for references to subsidiaries, brands, and executives.
- Negotiation guidance includes centralizing and documenting communications, buying time for response work, and asking attackers to demonstrate that a decryption key works.
- Instructure said it reached an agreement with ShinyHunters after the group claimed to have stolen records; the company said the data was returned and proof of destruction provided.
- CWT reportedly negotiated a $10 million ransom demand down to $4.5 million and paid; UCSF paid more than $1 million for a decryption key and assurances about stolen data.
- The article emphasizes preparation, secure backups, tested incident response plans, and experienced professional support; it warns that payment cannot ensure data will be deleted or systems restored.
Article Details
- Topic
- Ransomware negotiation tactics and real-life examples
Threat Actors
Malware
Products
Countries
Industries
Educationthreat actor group, ShinyHunters, revealed on their data leak site that they had allegedly breached the education technology company Instructure, a cloud-based education technology company best known for its CanvasHealthcareTravel managementtravel management company, CWT’s network, shutting down more than 30,000 computers and exfiltrating sensitive corporate data.