ThreatLabz Report Finds Enterprise AI Use Surged as Data and Security Risks Grew

· Original article ↗

Summary

ThreatLabz’s analysis of nearly one trillion AI/ML transactions in 2025 found enterprise usage rose 83%, data transfers to AI tools increased 93%, and organizations blocked 39% of access attempts amid emerging security risks.

Key points

  • AI/ML transactions grew 83% year over year across more than 3,400 applications observed in 2025.
  • Data transfers to AI tools rose 93% year over year, increasing exposure of sensitive enterprise information.
  • Organizations blocked 39% of AI/ML access attempts, while unsanctioned use and embedded SaaS AI features may have less oversight.
  • ThreatLabz said every enterprise AI system tested failed at least once under realistic adversarial pressure.
  • The report describes threat actors using AI to support social engineering, fake personas, evasion, and malware development.
  • Finance and Insurance accounted for 23.3% of enterprise AI/ML activity, and Manufacturing for 19.5%.

Article Details

Publisher
Zscaler (ThreatLabz report)
Report Period
2025
Scope
Enterprise AI/ML activity and security across global enterprises, based on transactions observed through the Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange.
Sample Size
Nearly 1 trillion AI/ML transactions across more than 3,400 applications; the report also describes red-team testing of enterprise AI systems without specifying the number tested.
Key Statistics
  • Enterprise AI/ML transactions increased 83% year over year in 2025; analysis covered more than 3,400 applications generating AI/ML traffic.
  • Data transfers to AI tools increased 93% year over year in 2025, reaching tens of thousands of terabytes in total.
  • Enterprises blocked 39% of AI/ML access attempts in 2025.
  • Finance & Insurance accounted for 23.3% of enterprise AI/ML activity; Manufacturing accounted for 19.5%.
  • Every enterprise AI system tested in ThreatLabz red-team testing failed at least once under realistic adversarial pressure; the number of systems tested was not stated.
Recommendations
  • Maintain visibility into AI usage, exposure, and dependencies across applications, models, pipelines, and supporting infrastructure, including through AI bills of material.
  • Use granular access controls and inline inspection of prompts and responses to prevent sensitive data from being sent to external models and unsafe outputs from being returned.
  • Protect enterprise AI applications and infrastructure with system hardening, runtime protections, vulnerability detection, and adversarial red-team testing.
  • Align AI controls with industry risk profiles, compliance requirements, and operational dependencies.
  • Explicitly classify and monitor embedded AI features and their data flows within approved SaaS applications.

Vendors

Products

Industries

Related Articles