Adversa Finds Only 11% of 100 AI Agents Both Capable and Well-Defended

· Original article ↗

Summary

Adversa’s assessment of 100 AI agents across ten categories found only 11% both capable and well-defended, while 98% had access to private data, untrusted content and outbound actions. It recommends focusing defenses on egress, identity and irreversible actions.

Key points

  • Adversa’s analysis found only 11% of the 100 agents qualified as both capable and well-defended; 98% had the “lethal trifecta” of private-data access, exposure to untrusted content and outbound actions.
  • Computer agents and coding agents showed the greatest gap between capability and protection, according to the analysis.
  • Computer agents may have broad operating-system access, while users may have limited visibility into the actions taken between a task and its result.
  • Coding agents can access shells, dependencies, secrets, signing keys and deployment pipelines; reviewing the final code may not reveal their full action trail.
  • The report says tool execution accounts for 76% of blast radius and that 83% of claimed agent defenses are not publicly verifiable.
  • Adversa recommends focusing defenses on controllable areas such as egress, identity and irreversible actions, rather than relying on prompt filtering.

Article Details

Publisher
SecurityWeek
Scope
Security and capability assessment of AI agents across ten categories
Sample Size
100 AI agents
Key Statistics
  • 98% of tested agents had the lethal trifecta: private-data access, exposure to untrusted content, and outbound-action capability.
  • 11 of 100 tested agents (11%) were categorized as capable and well-defended.
  • Tool execution accounted for 76% of blast radius, according to Adversa.
  • 37% of the market was described as audited more than defended.
  • 83% of claimed AI-agent defenses were not publicly verifiable.
Recommendations
  • Prioritize controls over agent egress, identity, and irreversible actions.
  • Focus defensive effort on controlling agent outputs, where possible.