Adversa Finds Only 11% of 100 AI Agents Both Capable and Well-Defended

Summary
Adversa’s assessment of 100 AI agents across ten categories found only 11% both capable and well-defended, while 98% had access to private data, untrusted content and outbound actions. It recommends focusing defenses on egress, identity and irreversible actions.
Key points
- Adversa’s analysis found only 11% of the 100 agents qualified as both capable and well-defended; 98% had the “lethal trifecta” of private-data access, exposure to untrusted content and outbound actions.
- Computer agents and coding agents showed the greatest gap between capability and protection, according to the analysis.
- Computer agents may have broad operating-system access, while users may have limited visibility into the actions taken between a task and its result.
- Coding agents can access shells, dependencies, secrets, signing keys and deployment pipelines; reviewing the final code may not reveal their full action trail.
- The report says tool execution accounts for 76% of blast radius and that 83% of claimed agent defenses are not publicly verifiable.
- Adversa recommends focusing defenses on controllable areas such as egress, identity and irreversible actions, rather than relying on prompt filtering.
Article Details
- Publisher
- SecurityWeek
- Scope
- Security and capability assessment of AI agents across ten categories
- Sample Size
- 100 AI agents
- Key Statistics
- 98% of tested agents had the lethal trifecta: private-data access, exposure to untrusted content, and outbound-action capability.
- 11 of 100 tested agents (11%) were categorized as capable and well-defended.
- Tool execution accounted for 76% of blast radius, according to Adversa.
- 37% of the market was described as audited more than defended.
- 83% of claimed AI-agent defenses were not publicly verifiable.
- Recommendations
- Prioritize controls over agent egress, identity, and irreversible actions.
- Focus defensive effort on controlling agent outputs, where possible.
