CISOs Say Security Tool Churn Is an Operating Model Problem

· Original article ↗

Summary

CISOs say tool churn and slow vulnerability response often stem from unclear ownership, coordination and corporate priorities—not inadequate technology. They recommend assigning tool owners, defining use cases and reconsidering barriers to automated response.

Key points

  • Bobby Singh said security tools are often replaced because they were never fully operationalized, not because the tools were inadequate.
  • Singh recommended naming a business owner for each tool and reviewing its value after 90 or 120 days.
  • Aditya Gurg said a vulnerability fix took an hour, but closure took three days because teams had not agreed on notification, emergency-change approval and business communications.
  • Cotiviti uses a framework of 80 questions to identify 10 priority use cases for a new tool or product, assigning an owner to each use case.
  • Carey Frey argued that resistance to automated defensive actions can leave organizations analyzing attacks and responding days later.
  • Larry Zelvin said CISO reporting lines can limit access to senior decision-makers and called for reconsidering whether security leadership should sit outside technology.

Article Details

Topic
Organizational and operational barriers to effective cybersecurity, including security-tool churn, unclear ownership, vendor relationships, and resistance to automated defensive actions.

People

Vendors

Products

Industries

Related Articles